Zhao-Hua Wang believes that the extended producer responsibility, the relevant laws of China there is a big problem now is much talk about the framework, provides little detail. Specifically, first, the lack of targeted specific legislation, and second, quad band cell phone the relevant provisions of existing laws is imperfect.
The European Union, for example, extended producer responsibility for, the EU has introduced the "Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive" (WEEE Directive) and "electrical and electronic equipment on the Prohibition of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances Directive" (ROHS Directive). The legislation embodies the spirit and design of the system widely recognized internationally.
In contrast, our country, in the "Solid Waste Pollution Prevention Law" has been involved on the extended producer responsibility, but only in principle the provisions of the lack of specific rules of operation. The "Circular Economy Promotion Law" and a series of beacon meaningful laws, it is also a lack of clear rules.
In 2009, the State Council promulgated the "recycling of waste electrical and electronic products regulations" will come into force in 2011, the specific implementation of the results were unpredictable, we can only wait and see.
- There are two "hard to define"
Technically speaking, there are two extended producer responsibility "is defined difficult." Zhao-Hua Wang said, one "producer" difficult to define. Fortunately, electronic products, said the relative, such as a brand of computer, we can define its tangible product to the producer, is relatively simple. Some products may be more complicated, containing a variety of key components such as integrated products, generally through multiple stages of the design, development and production of a number of manufacturers, formed by the integration of a variety of services. It is less easy to determine the producer.
Second is the "responsibility" difficult to define. Extent to producers in the end bear the responsibility? Is only paid if they do, or bear all the responsibility for recycling? Academia has been debated. Responsibility is too small to achieve the purpose of recycling, responsibility too, is not conducive to business, business easy to tie die. If defined properly, is easy to pick up a pound-foolish. Zhao-Hua Wang believes that this is also the country has yet to introduce laws for a reason.
- Difficult to design cost mechanism
Currently in the international arena, paid recycling as the main means of accountability. Zhao-Hua Wang said the cost of the attendant is a mechanism design problem. First of all, who bear the cost of the problem. The full burden of the producers? Or the Government, producers and consumers to share? Secondly, the question how to account for cost recovery. china cell phone wholesale Added products is the price in advance? Or in the recovery of part of another charge? These issues are very difficult reality.
没有评论:
发表评论